I find this a fine concept. In fact, only a couple of years ago I was seriously considering to introduce Marriage Courts to the world. I believe the modern society desperately needs to re-haul the whole concept of marriage. Maybe it's a bit different from the High Courts of Love though, so let me elaborate on my ingenious idea.
In a nutshell, we all know that in our day and age (and I should probably add, in 1st world countries) the only reason to get married is feelings. Most women can very well manage their finances. Most men are sensible enough to hire cleaning ladies. There's no need to constantly pop children in order to expand the family's farming workforce. What's left? Love, love, love. Obvious problems arise when you base a life contract on something that… underappreciated.
Yes, I think the main problem with lasting relationships these days is that we don't appreciate what we are feeling. Our generation is greedy, and for the most part we all want more. More of everything: more money in our bank, more adrenalin in our blood, more years to our life. Why not more spouse candidates?
Our generation is used to upgrades. We don't even attempt to fix anything anymore, we just get the N.N version of the device in trouble and we are happy for another year or two before the next upgrade comes out. Come to think of it, we don't even need to wait for any trouble to happen to change the device. We do it just because the upgrade is available. We want our "more" to always be "better". A better job, a better APR, a better diet. Why not a better spouse upgrade?
Our generation has Attention Deficit Disorder. So how can we be expected to keep our relationship if we cannot even focus enough attention on it?
So my solution to the problem is to create an environment that will make you appreciate your relationship. And when do we usually start to appreciate anything we have? Exactly - when we don't have it anymore! So theoretically, if we create an artificial threat to the longevity of a relationship, it should make this relationship last longer.
Marriage Contract will be signed between partners for 5 years. After this term, you are free to go OR if you wish to extend for another 5 years, you can go to the Marriage Court and defend your case. I bet you that will reduce the divorce rate dramatically. And even if not, a term contract almost guarantees that you will have a more quality relationship for the 5 years that you have together. It's human nature to enjoy things more if we know for a fact they won't last long.
Of course, there are many questions about the implementation of such a system in the society. "Who will be the judges in the Marriage Court?" "What do you do with children?" "How do you divide property?" but I think that I'm on the right track with the general concept, no?
- Attraction to the lady, usually via eyes/glance.
- Worship of the lady from afar.
- Declaration of passionate devotion.
- Virtuous rejection by the lady.
- Renewed wooing with oaths of virtue and eternal fealty.
- Moans of approaching death from unsatisfied desire (and other physical manifestations of lovesickness).
- Heroic deeds of valor which win the lady's heart.
- Consummation of the secret love.
- Endless adventures and subterfuges avoiding detection.
Complicated, really. In our ADD age it probably goes something like this:
- Consummation.
- Attraction.
- A short relationship.
- A quick heart-break.
- Moving on.
- Rinse, repeat.
This is so weird that you posted this today ! Just last night I was watching on the Internet a lecture by sociologist Jean-Paul Kaufmann which dealt with the meaning of mariage in hypermodern society !
ReplyDeleteHe was making some of your points about our generation always wanting more and how it impacted our relationships. Except in his view people don't always marry for love.
One of his premises was that nowadays we basically look for a partner the way we shop for a car, making comparisons, thinking there has to be someone nicer, richer, better suited, even signing up on Internet Websites looking for "a tall blond male who likes Japanese movies, wants two kids and jogs on Sunday mornings from 9 to 10"…
It was a fascinating and very insightful 90-minute lecture about how our modern freedom has us struggling and overthinking to choose our identity (something our ancestors didn't have the leisure to do, as they just followed in the steps of their parents and whatever society had decided for them) and how tough it is to let that identity change when we fall in love and become part of a couple.
Couldn't find a link in English, but here it is in French anyways :
http://www.canal-u.tv/producteurs/universite_de_tous_les_savoirs/dossier_programmes/les_conferences_de_l_annee_2005/la_famille_aujourd_hui/le_couple
Have a great afternoon in paradise. Still no news from the administration, grrrrr. Dying to fly over and see you.
Oh how cool is that! I'll definitely check out the link. I'm telling you - the world is in need of the new approach to relationships!!!:)
ReplyDeleteI hope you get your papers soon. Cannot wait to see you!